iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF - COMMON STOCK (EFAV)
CUSIP: 46429B689
Q1 2020 13F Holders as of 31 Mar 2020
- Type / Class
- Equity / COMMON STOCK
- Shares outstanding
- 65,349,552
- Total 13F shares
- 106,419,973
- Share change
- -5,481,198
- Total reported value
- $6,597,240,248
- Put/Call ratio
- 3.2%
- Price per share
- $62.05
- Number of holders
- 541
- Value change
- -$386,108,064
- Number of buys
- 251
- Number of sells
- 313
Quarterly Holders Quick Answers
What is CUSIP 46429B689?
CUSIP 46429B689 identifies EFAV - iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF - COMMON STOCK in SEC institutional holdings data.
Need full ownership history?
Open the full security ownership history page.
Next holder-history checks
These links keep the next click tied to holder verification, nearby quarters, or outside-13F ownership context.
- Back to full security ownership history for the broader multi-quarter picture.
- Latest 13F filings for newly reported positions across managers.
- Latest Schedule 13D/13G reports for ownership changes outside the 13F cadence.
- SEC investors directory for manager drilldown.
Explore More Reporting Periods
Jump to adjacent filing periods for faster comparison and easier crawl discovery.
Recent filing periods for CUSIP 46429B689:
Top shareholders of EFAV - iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF - COMMON STOCK (13F + 13D/G + 3/4/5)
Grouped by holder across the latest SEC ownership disclosures. Ownership % is shown only when it is directly reported or safely comparable across share classes.
Institutional Holders of iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF - COMMON STOCK (EFAV) as of Q1 2020
| Investor | Option | Weight % | Change % | Value $ | * Price | Shares | Share Change | Activity | Report Period |
|---|
Compare Q1 2020 vs Q4 2019 Across Filers
| Investor | Q4 2019 Shares | Q1 2020 Shares | Share Diff | Share Chg % | Q4 2019 Value $ | Q1 2020 Value $ | Value Diff $ | Value Chg % |
|---|
Trend: ostatnie 8 kwartałów (+ wybrane okresy porównania).
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.