CUSIP: 464288653
Q4 2022 13F Holders as of 31 Dec 2022
-
Type / Class
-
Equity / 10-20 YR TRS ETF
-
Total 13F shares
-
51,564,677
-
Share change
-
+14,014,213
-
Total reported value
-
$5,579,311,222
-
Put/Call ratio
-
92%
-
Price per share
-
$108.18
-
Number of holders
-
347
-
Value change
-
+$1,516,604,051
-
Number of buys
-
243
-
Number of sells
-
97
Security key
464288653
Report period
Q4 2022
Institutions
347
Top holders
10
Reporting periods
Holder history for CUSIP 464288653
Recent filing periods:
Top shareholders of TLH - ISHARES TR - 10-20 YR TRS ETF (13F + 13D/G + 3/4/5)
Grouped by holder across the latest SEC ownership disclosures. Start with the largest verified stakes, then open the linked filing trail.
No top shareholder records were found across 13F, 13D/G, and Forms 3/4/5 for this issuer.
Institutional Holders of ISHARES TR - 10-20 YR TRS ETF (TLH) as of Q4 2022
As of 31 Dec 2022,
ISHARES TR - 10-20 YR TRS ETF (TLH) was held by
347 institutional
shareholders
that filed Form 13F with the SEC.
Together, they reported ownership of
51,564,677 shares.
The largest 10 holders included
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/, ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT INC, Forum Financial Management, LP, Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC, AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC, BlackRock Inc., MORGAN STANLEY, LPL Financial LLC, TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP, and CWM, LLC.
This page lists
346
institutional shareholders reporting positions in this security
for the Q4 2022 filing period.
| Investor |
Option |
Weight % |
Change % |
Value $ |
* Price
|
Shares |
Share Change |
Activity |
Report Period |
Compare Q4 2022 vs Q3 2022 Across Filers
| Investor |
Q3 2022 Shares |
Q4 2022 Shares |
Share Diff |
Share Chg % |
Q3 2022 Value $ |
Q4 2022 Value $ |
Value Diff $ |
Value Chg % |
Trend: ostatnie 8 kwartałów (+ wybrane okresy porównania).
* Reported Price is the price of the security as of the portfolio date. This value is significant in that it is the last known price at which the security was still held.
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.