Type / Class
Equity / FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
Shares outstanding
6,525,448
Total 13F shares
658,781
Share change
-34,259
Total reported value
$22,231,126
Price per share
$33.75
Number of holders
20
Value change
-$1,161,052
Number of buys
10
Number of sells
9

Sponsored

Quarterly Holders Quick Answers

What is CUSIP 33740F730?
CUSIP 33740F730 identifies DMAY - First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May in SEC institutional holdings data.

Need full ownership history?
Open the full security ownership history page.

Institutional Holders of First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) as of Q3 2021

As of 30 Sep 2021, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) was held by 20 institutional shareholders that filed Form 13F with the SEC. Together, they reported ownership of 658,781 shares. The largest 10 holders included ADVISOR GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., Donald L. Hagan, LLC, Mutual Advisors, LLC, Cetera Advisor Networks LLC, COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC, Cetera Investment Advisers, Kestra Advisory Services, LLC, Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., OLD MISSION CAPITAL LLC, and HARBOUR INVESTMENTS, INC.. This page lists 20 institutional shareholders reporting positions in this security for the Q3 2021 filing period.
Investor Option Weight % Change % Value $ * Price Shares Share Change Activity Report Period

Compare Q3 2021 vs Q2 2021 Across Filers

Q2 2021 holders
21
Q3 2021 holders
20
Holder diff
-1
Investor Q2 2021 Shares Q3 2021 Shares Share Diff Share Chg % Q2 2021 Value $ Q3 2021 Value $ Value Diff $ Value Chg %

Trend: ostatnie 8 kwartałów (+ wybrane okresy porównania).

Quarterly Holders Trend
Quarterly Value Trend
Quarterly Shares Trend
* Reported Price is the price of the security as of the portfolio date. This value is significant in that it is the last known price at which the security was still held.
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.