Type / Class
Equity / FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
Shares outstanding
5,849,859
Total 13F shares
2,329,383
Share change
+521,100
Total reported value
$99,136,764
Price per share
$42.56
Number of holders
98
Value change
+$22,233,024
Number of buys
54
Number of sells
30

Sponsored

Quarterly Holders Quick Answers

What is CUSIP 33740F714?
CUSIP 33740F714 identifies DJUN - First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June in SEC institutional holdings data.

Need full ownership history?
Open the full security ownership history page.

Institutional Holders of First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) as of Q3 2024

As of 30 Sep 2024, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) was held by 98 institutional shareholders that filed Form 13F with the SEC. Together, they reported ownership of 2,329,383 shares. The largest 10 holders included Kestra Advisory Services, LLC, REAP Financial Group, LLC, COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC, Sequent Planning LLC, Concurrent Investment Advisors, LLC, Signal Advisors Wealth, LLC, Per Stirling Capital Management, LLC., OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC., Foguth Wealth Management, LLC., and CWM, LLC. This page lists 98 institutional shareholders reporting positions in this security for the Q3 2024 filing period.
Investor Option Weight % Change % Value $ * Price Shares Share Change Activity Report Period

Compare Q3 2024 vs Q2 2024 Across Filers

Q2 2024 holders
84
Q3 2024 holders
98
Holder diff
14
Investor Q2 2024 Shares Q3 2024 Shares Share Diff Share Chg % Q2 2024 Value $ Q3 2024 Value $ Value Diff $ Value Chg %

Trend: ostatnie 8 kwartałów (+ wybrane okresy porównania).

Quarterly Holders Trend
Quarterly Value Trend
Quarterly Shares Trend
* Reported Price is the price of the security as of the portfolio date. This value is significant in that it is the last known price at which the security was still held.
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.