Type / Class
Equity / First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX(R) Fund
Shares outstanding
1,050,032
Total 13F shares
3,742,669
Share change
+105,737
Total reported value
$192,244,000
Price per share
$51.37
Number of holders
26
Value change
+$5,728,925
Number of buys
12
Number of sells
12

Sponsored

Quarterly Holders Quick Answers

What is CUSIP 33737J232?
CUSIP 33737J232 identifies FSZ - First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDEX(R) Fund II - First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX(R) Fund in SEC institutional holdings data.

Need full ownership history?
Open the full security ownership history page.

Institutional Holders of First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDEX(R) Fund II - First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX(R) Fund (FSZ) as of Q3 2017

As of 30 Sep 2017, First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDEX(R) Fund II - First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX(R) Fund (FSZ) was held by 26 institutional shareholders that filed Form 13F with the SEC. Together, they reported ownership of 3,742,669 shares. The largest 10 holders included FIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP, MORGAN STANLEY, WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN, HPM Partners LLC, BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/, STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP, UBS Group AG, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, and Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.. This page lists 26 institutional shareholders reporting positions in this security for the Q3 2017 filing period.
Investor Option Weight % Change % Value $ * Price Shares Share Change Activity Report Period

Compare Q3 2017 vs Q2 2017 Across Filers

Q2 2017 holders
31
Q3 2017 holders
26
Holder diff
-5
Investor Q2 2017 Shares Q3 2017 Shares Share Diff Share Chg % Q2 2017 Value $ Q3 2017 Value $ Value Diff $ Value Chg %

Trend: ostatnie 8 kwartałów (+ wybrane okresy porównania).

Quarterly Holders Trend
Quarterly Value Trend
Quarterly Shares Trend
* Reported Price is the price of the security as of the portfolio date. This value is significant in that it is the last known price at which the security was still held.
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.