Recommended decision now
Launch the paid pilot as PortfolioSavvy Pro.
The current decision is to stay on portfoliosavvy.com, use PortfolioSavvy Pro everywhere billing-facing, and stop blocking the first paid pilot on a new domain.
Noindex paid launch gate
The current decision is to skip a new domain for now, keep PortfolioSavvy as the live product, and test whether prosumer investors will pay for filing-backed watchlists, alerts, and ownership intelligence.
Current brand/domain lock
This is the product decision gate after the brand sprint. HolderLens stays available as a future candidate, but the first billing smoke should use the current PortfolioSavvy identity.
| Name | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
| PortfolioSavvy Pro | Selected paid-pilot identity | Use the current domain and current account/support identity for the first billing smoke and paid pilot. |
| HolderLens | Park for future counsel/domain screen | RDAP snapshot returned no registration for holderlens.com or holderlens.io, and exact web search did not show an obvious financial research product. |
| StakeSignal | Pause as billing name | Strong concept, but stakesignal.com is registered and public web results show external product usage. |
| PortfolioSavvy | Keep as fallback | Safest paid-pilot identity if a new name cannot be cleared before billing readiness. |
| FilingLens / OwnerLens / CapitalTrace | Do not advance | Each has current external usage close enough to create avoidable trust or category confusion. |
Paid launch decision brief
This is the staging review board for the next operational gate: verify PortfolioSavvy Pro in Stripe test mode before any production checkout appears.
Recommended decision now
The current decision is to stay on portfoliosavvy.com, use PortfolioSavvy Pro everywhere billing-facing, and stop blocking the first paid pilot on a new domain.
Future candidate
HolderLens remains the cleanest future new-brand candidate, but it should not slow staging billing smoke or the first paid pilot.
Payment blocker
Keep BILLING_BRAND_DECISION_APPROVED off in production until the PortfolioSavvy Pro staging checkout, webhook, account state, receipts, and support copy agree.
| Launch path | Speed | Clarity | Domain migration | Best for | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PortfolioSavvy Pro | Fastest | Medium | None | The first paid pilot on the current domain. | Selected. |
| HolderLens product-line brand | Fast | High | Deferred | Testing sharper ownership-intelligence positioning before a domain migration. | Future screen. |
| Full HolderLens rebrand | Slowest | Highest if validated | Required | Only after legal/domain screening and measurable landing lift. | Defer. |
Current gate status
Recommended staging next step: run the PortfolioSavvy Pro billing smoke in Stripe test mode. Leave production checkout disabled until the staging flow proves pricing, checkout, receipts, webhook entitlement sync, account state, and support identity.
Review questions
Decision recommendation
The recommended path is staging billing validation under the current brand, not an immediate production rename.
Rank 01
86
Fit score
Selected paid-pilot identity
Fastest route to billing learning because auth, canonical domain, email/support identity, and user trust stay coherent.
Filing-backed ownership alerts for serious investors.
Rank 02
88
Fit score
Future legal-screen candidate
Best blend of ownership clarity, company-page fit, watchlist fit, and current availability signal.
Revisit only after paid pilot learning justifies rebrand effort.
Rank 03
70
Fit score
Concept only
Strong marketing read, but third-party usage and domain status make it inappropriate as the presumed billing brand.
Keep the signal language; do not keep the name unless clearance is clean.
Candidate scorecard
Scores are a directional product heuristic for staging review. They are not trademark, domain, or legal clearance.
| Name | Clarity | Ownership fit | Evidence trust | Return loop | Paid fit | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PortfolioSavvy Pro | 4/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
Selected paid-pilot identity Use for first billing smoke and paid pilot on portfoliosavvy.com. |
| HolderLens | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
Future legal/domain screen Strongest clean future candidate if paid pilot evidence later supports a rebrand. |
| StakeSignal | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 |
Do not advance without clearance Great concept, but external usage makes it a billing-name risk. |
| FilingSignal | 4/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
Do not advance Descriptive, but too close to active filing-copilot market language. |
Step 1
Use PortfolioSavvy Pro as the exact billing-facing name before live Stripe links, receipts, or sender identity appear.
Step 2
Verify pricing, checkout, success/cancel, webhook entitlement sync, account settings, receipts, and support copy in Stripe test mode.
Step 3
Keep production checkout disabled until staging proves the full PortfolioSavvy Pro flow.
Step 4
Only reopen HolderLens or a new domain after paid pilot learning justifies the migration cost.
Payment launch gate
Entitlements and checkout plumbing can keep moving behind feature flags, but the first paid user should see PortfolioSavvy Pro from landing page to receipt.
Selected paid pilot
Launches Pro fastest because current trust, auth, email, and canonical surfaces stay stable.
No domain migration before paid launch.
The name remains less sharp than the ownership-signal product promise.
Future staged screen
Could test a sharper HolderLens promise later while accounts, receipts, and SEO stay on the current domain.
Use product-line language first; defer canonical/domain migration.
Requires careful copy so users do not feel they are paying a different company than the one they joined.
Highest upside, highest coordination
Best if landing tests prove a materially stronger conversion story before checkout goes live.
Requires separate SEO, canonical, email, Stripe statement descriptor, support, and redirect milestone.
A premature domain move can slow product learning and introduce trust friction.
Decision artifact
This page is the staging review surface. The repo document is the durable source of truth for launch sequencing, trademark screening, domain checks, SEO migration, and Stripe identity before real payments.
Use PortfolioSavvy Pro before pricing, checkout, receipts, support copy, and account settings go live.
Defer new-name legal and common-law screening until a future rebrand/product-line milestone.
Keep portfoliosavvy.com for the first paid pilot.
Keep canonical URLs stable until redirects, sitemap, robots, structured data, and crawl smoke are ready.
Match product name, statement descriptor, receipt copy, support email, and cancellation copy.
Positioning hypothesis
The best brand direction is not another generic SEC search tool or AI summary wrapper. It should own the user job that keeps coming back: knowing when important owners, insiders, or large holders changed behavior, and opening the source filing in one click.
13F
A top fund opens a new position or raises concentration.
Form 4
An insider buy clusters with repeat buyer history.
13D/G
A large holder crosses a meaningful ownership threshold.
Watchlist
A saved company shows new activity since the last visit.
Logo and visual tone
The strongest visual system should be compact enough for dashboards, credible beside SEC citations, and energetic enough for alerts/watchlists.
Ink, cyan, signal green
Precise, premium, evidence-first
Best for HolderLens if ownership intelligence becomes the primary brand promise.
Charcoal, steel, cyan
Research-led, calm, citation-native
Best for HolderLens if the trust layer and source trail become the main differentiator.
Graphite, blue, fresh green
Simple, approachable, company-page friendly
Best for PortfolioSavvy continuity if the brand should feel less trader-oriented.
Name candidates
These candidates are intentionally tested as messaging, not as production identity changes.
Launch Pro on portfoliosavvy.com so pricing, checkout, receipts, account settings, and support copy all use one identity.
The name is less sharp than a future ownership-intelligence rebrand, so product copy must carry the signal promise.
Plain-language ownership intelligence: see who holds, who adds, who exits, and which filing proves it.
Keep as a future rebrand/product-line candidate after paid pilot learning.
Keep the current identity because brand clearance should not slow the paid pilot.
Less sharp than the filing-backed ownership intelligence promise.
Still a strong product concept, but current web/domain evidence makes it too risky to presume as the paid brand.
Do not advance without legal clearance, domain strategy, and conflict review.
Credible words individually, but current external usage creates trust and confusion risk.
Too much adjacent web noise for a financial trust product.
Descriptive and evidence-forward, but already appears as an active filing research product.
Too close to active filing-copilot positioning.
Filing-native and memorable for power users, but cryptic for broader prosumer investors.
Too insider-baseball for first-time users and weak for trust onboarding.
Decision rules
A first-time investor should understand the ownership signal promise without reading a methodology page.
The name cannot imply black-box scoring; SEC filing proximity remains part of the brand.
The strongest name should make watchlists and alerts feel natural, not bolted on later.
It should cover 13F, insiders, 13D/G, company pages, and future research modules without sounding enterprise-only.