Glucotrack, Inc. Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
Glucotrack, Inc. quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Glucotrack, Inc. Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was -$3.25M, a 46.2% decline year-over-year.
  • Glucotrack, Inc. Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was -$13.1M, a 119% decline year-over-year.
  • Glucotrack, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was -$7.1M, a 60.3% decline from 2022.
  • Glucotrack, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was -$4.43M, a 9.7% decline from 2021.
  • Glucotrack, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was -$4.04M, a 29% decline from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 -$7.1M -$2.67M -60.3% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-03-28
2022 -$4.43M -$392K -9.7% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-03-28
2021 -$4.04M -$908K -29% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2023-03-31
2020 -$3.13M -$6.64M -189% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2022-03-31
2019 $3.51M +$10M Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2021-04-13
2018 -$6.54M -$17.1M -162% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2020-04-14
2017 $10.6M +$16.2M Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2019-04-15
2016 -$5.66M -$1M -21.5% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-03-30
2015 -$4.66M -$1.05M -29.1% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-03-30
2014 -$3.61M -$579K -19.1% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-03-31
2013 -$3.03M -$254K -9.17% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-03-30
2012 -$2.77M -$440K -18.9% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-03-31
2011 -$2.33M -$943K -67.8% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-03-28
2010 -$1.39M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-04-01
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.